Robert Pratt
A few comments on the case of this woman, Rachel Dolezal, who claims she is black but is not.
No matter what she thinks the truth is to her, a vestige of the moral relativism of the anti-God Left which holds that no absolute truth exists – except of course whatever they want everyone to believe at given time, the woman is little more than a charlatan, a perpetuator of fraud.
Far more troubling is her philosophy about race and what it means to be of a particular race. The idea that one’s race determines one’s culture or political and other outlook is little different than the claim of the racist that one’s race determines one’s intelligence and abilities.
…if such exists, the woman in question is among the greatest practitioners of “white privilege” in history.
In other words, this fake black-babe and her supporters are engaging in the evil of racism at its root: that if one is of a certain race one automatically assumes a set of beliefs and cultural identities with all the limitation that comes with being pigeon-holed in such a way.
Add to this the laughable ideas of Karlos Hill, a Texas Tech professor of history, who told a Lubbock newspaper that “It was admirable that she forfeited her white privilege” while then adding that her trans-racialism was also problematic.
If Professor Karlos Hill was the intellectual he surely believes himself to be, as an adherent of the “white privilege” theory, he would understand that if such exists, the woman in question is among the greatest practitioners of “white privilege” in history. Her “white privilege” was so great that she used such to interlope into a racial community, become a power figure and trade off of the past suffering of members of that community.
How do you exercise privilege more than forcing others to take you as something you are not? That’s privilege to the extreme.
throw in a few abortions, a little more fraud, some theft, and just a good bit more sorryness and she might be a good v.p. pick for the democrats