Pratt on Texas - click for home page
 
 

Join our Listener Club 

              

Featured Listener Comments Section:   Contents List

OmahaSteaks.com, Inc.
  Listener Comment  
 

 

 

 

One-term per lifetime for U.S. Senators

Listener: James
Category: General
Date: 26 Mar 2010
Time: 14:20:48 -0700
Remote Name: 68.89.241.253

Comments

Pratt,

I think that a One Term per Lifetime Limit for all U. S. Senators and Representatives is the change to our government that will restore benevolent representation. I want to fix this government design for all time so that my children and yours will enjoy living in a functioning Representative Republic and I need voices like yours to make it happen. Here is my list of reasons for this needed Constitutional Amendment.

1) One or two terms occurred naturally for the first 100 years of our Country
2) It was the original intent of our Founding Fathers to have a Congress that would serve and then shortly return to live under their own laws.
3) It will create a Citizen Legislature as intended by our Founding Fathers
4) It will end the need to loot the treasury to 'Buy Votes' for the next election
5) It will end law-making which spans generations and end law-making as a Career
6) It will stop the Entrenched Ruling and Imperial Leadership from Career Politicians
7) It will reduce the influence of lobbyists and donors on the Lawmakers
8) It will stop the rewarding of Career Politicians with leadership positions
9) It will end the elitist position of Career Politician
10) It will end the exemptions from the law by Lawmakers
11) It will give added interest and importance to every election
12) It will end the re-election advantage of Incumbency
13) It will end the temptations of pork barrel and deficit spending to aid a re-election
14) It will disconnect the known and the unknown power brokers from their sources
15) It will devolve the over-reaching power of the U. S. Government back to the States
16) It will provide the most individual freedom allowed in a Representative Republic

I think that you have the nerve to throw stones when you have a belief so I hope that you will become a supporter and help me and our nation to fix this understandable oversight by our Founding Fathers. I think that our Founding Fathers would have included a ban on Career Politicians in our U. S. Constitution if they could have predicted their rise to power. I know that if I was a Founding Father with the gift to see the future then I would have enacted a One Term per Lifetime Limit for all Senators and Representatives. Constant turnover in leadership will keep the lawmakers as weak and as grassroots as possible and it will force them to live under their own laws. I think that constant turnover and the removal of Imperial Leadership will slow and perhaps reverse the advance to Socialism in our Country and that is why it must be tried. If it is not done, then Career Politicians using wealth re-distribution laws will ultimately build an un-beatable majority of dependent voters and our Country will not be able to sustain itself. It is easy to move the wagon when everyone is pushing but it is impossible to move the wagon when everyone is riding.

Thanks for Listening,

From an Integrated Circuit Designer
James

Pratt responds:

I think we’d do just as well to go back to state legislatures electing senators. Moving to popular elections removed all sway (purposefully) of the states in the Congress. The framers knew what they were doing when they had states appoint senators.

Your ideas are fine but I’m against a constitutional convention as there is no sure way to limit what such convention does.

 

 



© 2006

   

     Join our Listener Club here.
     *several modified JAVAscripts in this site are courtesy of The JavaScript Directory.          
     
Webmaster resources and banners for Pratt on Texas        Interested in HD (new high definition) radio? Read a summary here.

Pratt's
MySpace

CalendarLubbock.com Lubbock's oldest on-line event calendar Paul Fredrick MenStyle