Pratt on Texas - click for home page
 
 

Join our Listener Club 

              

Featured Listener Comments Section:   Contents List

OmahaSteaks.com, Inc.
  Listener Comment  
 

 

 

 

A different take on the Cambridge, Mass. arrest debacle

Listener: John
Category: General
Date: 24 Jul 2009
Time: 11:55:39 -0700
Remote Name: 66.140.100.91

Comments

Pratt,

I’ve been a police chief twice and a federal agent. I also held police instructor license in Texas.

If one looks at the criminal law of disorderly conduct for the jurisdiction in this case, the most important element of the offense that must be proved is “in a public place.” That holds true with almost all of the other 49 states in this country. This was an unlawful arrest for a lot of reasons. Being on one’s own property can still get you arrested if the disturbance of the peace, e.g. a loud party in an upstairs apartment, standing on your own sidewalk and yelling at someone walking on the public sidewalk etc.

If you saw the news broadcasts, this house was on a large piece of land with trees on the boundary. The man was in his own house and the last time I read the constitution, free speech was still a privilege.

I would have been just as upset with this police Sergeant and I am white. We do not live in a police state and when we are in our own homes we have a higher expectation of our rights then when we are out in public. This was an unlawful arrest and the police are claiming they are the victim.

John

Pratt responds:

My understanding is that the man arrested followed the officer outside and continued the tirade there. And apparently that space is public enough that a neighbor was able to observe what appeared to be a breaking into the house.

I’ve read much about this, before it blew up in the public, and though I’m often not the first to side with the police on such issues and doubt whether arrest was warranted, I tend to side with the officer on this one in the overall picture.

I do agree with your sentiments about false arrest and speech.

Here is a column from a fellow retired policeman you might find interesting: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/obama_is_the_one_who_acted_stu_1.html

Also, Larry Elder is right about the issue in: HWB -- Home While Black

I agree with you that words are not sufficient for an arrest. But neither is what happened in this case an excuse to fan the flames of racial hatred and to damage the ability of police to do their jobs – and that is what President Obama has done by making comments when he admitted he did not have the facts. And that is what the case has become about – something which would not have been the case had the President kept quite until he had more complete information.

Robert

P.S. President Obama has now said he regrets his remarks. link
 

 



© 2006

   

     Join our Listener Club here.
     *several modified JAVAscripts in this site are courtesy of The JavaScript Directory.          
     
Webmaster resources and banners for Pratt on Texas        Interested in HD (new high definition) radio? Read a summary here.

Pratt's
MySpace

CalendarLubbock.com Lubbock's oldest on-line event calendar Paul Fredrick MenStyle